Sunday, December 24, 2017

The Amnesty Argument

The argument which all White nationalists subscribe to is a one against race mixing. The far-right will often believe that there can be no bicultural or “third position” race. The argument follows that there can be only “White” or “Asian.” There simply cannot be a “Eurasian” one. The mixed race person (or something that isn’t mixed at all) must choose a team consisting of either red or blue. There is no purple team.

Greg Johnson of Counter-Currents will also extend the argument to include “people of some mixed Asian ancestry” in an all-white ethnostate. But that person cannot ultimately race mix further. This is an amnesty. There is amnesty for mixed race people and they have to choose a side. Hence I call this phenomenon the “amnesty argument.”

Debate or talk to anyone on the alt-right, and the argument is that mixed race people belong on THAT side, but not the white one. In a way, there is a society of high minded white aristocrat, and then a sweeping mass of brown degenerate people. How has this citation improved?

White nationalist claim to have truth on their side. But the actual truth is, they don’t have an answer for the other, simply because they don’t care about the other. Hipster racism has already infiltrated the alt-right, creating more plants like Lauren Rose and Tara McCarthy.

The Golden One explained in a video (I forget which one) that what the Cultural Marxist did to academia in 60s, is what the Alt-right will do in 2020. There is now Cultural Fascism. No one wants to debate it because it is the hip and edgy norm all the cool kids are gravitating towards. They take their ideology from already established white nationalist and reinvent for their poorly thought out high-school mentality of social signaling.

White millennials are being proselytized to become white nationalist, and will neglect the future for half-white people. Do these mixed people assert themselves as fellow white people? Or do they belong in the gas chamber? There is no answer.

I, however, assert that biculturalism is the answer. And for Whites and Asians, call it “Eurasianism” or “Asian Aryanism.”

In a future where neo-liberalism is doomed, ethnonationalism will eventually replace it. And when ethnonationalism does replace the PC-tyrannical Kalergi plan, ethnonationalism will advocate that all races belong back to their designated “homelands.” Basically, Zionism for all peoples.

If ethnonationalsim was to reach out to a larger audience, then it should be reach out to those who don’t belong to a 100% “white” or “Asian” side. There has to be an institution that advocates biculturalism. Such a place would be the size of an Amish community. It could be in an white or Asian ethnosate, but have its own control (like Taiwan ). Could such a place be envisioned?

This is what I have been arguing for. The Amnesty Argument is not enough to answer the events of the past century. We simply cannot forget past history and move forward. There is no white-nationalist janitor that cleans out the decadence of the past and everything is wonderfully fixed. Technology is growing, and will eliminate certain generation social norms and trends.

Transhumanism is an opponent against white nationalism. Asian-Aryanism is not transhumanist, but is ethnonationalist and bicultural. This a problem the alt-right must face, but clearly it is too busy watching and consuming Youtube drama.

The normie doesn’t want the arts. The normie wants to norm but also wants to be an individual. The alt-right is a collective party of white individuals who want to believe they are in a collective. A sad high school mentality that addresses nothing.

In the end, international capitalism will make profit off the alt-rights demands, and they will always be keyboard warriors consuming and being complacent. Like someone who watches info wars.

Normies hate eccentrics because they don’t understand them. They want the alt-right to control crazy behavior. The world would be simple if people were just red or blue. If only the truth was grounded on the reality of race and sexuality, things would be better.

But no one on the alt-right has an answer for the differences of race or sexuality. They claim it, and watch as they suck into the powers of Lauren Rose and admire anime.

This dangerous belief of “claiming to be based on the truth” is what motivates arrogance in the normie looking for attention.

Jim Goad, who is an ultimate skeptic and truth seeker, is not someone on the alt-right. He does his own thing. And does a good job at it. I would classify myself as a Goadian. It doesn’t mean I have to subscribe to a new world religion based upon ethnonationalism. What it means is that I fight against the hypocrisy of normal people, because quite frankly, I hate normies. I hate when normies try and disguise themselves to be like me, do I find them to be even more repulsive.

The amnesty argument is a one-dimensional argument for ideological normies. They don’t have answers. Just social signals. 

No comments:

Post a Comment