Discover more from Polemics
My Socratic Attack Against a Eurasian-Futurist Boomer
"Boomers will hold onto liberalism, isolated individualism, and egalitarianism till the day they die."
Recently, I had a conversation with a boomer, named “Scrub Jay” on Twitter. My friend Robert A. Stark found the thread, and encouraged me to have a dialogue with him. It unfortunately went into a polemic attack against me just because I didn’t agree with him that “Asian women don’t go with sensitive white men,” and that it had something to do with IQ, which I agree to some extent. However, it gets hypocritical, as this boomer also denies race, yet believes in IQ, an inseparable conundrum, and some form of extreme, individualistic capitalism, a boomer value. Only when I agreed with him, he immediately became hostile at me. I find people like this disturbing, as they are out to hurt others over innocent statements.
For example, take this tweet I wrote:
Pilleater: “Does Radical Reviewer have a Japanese wife? Or does he just "live in Japan" and has no success?” (10-14-2022).
And he replied almost two weeks later,
Radical Reviewer: “Haha Huh what? I live in Cascadia and I am married.” (10-22-2022).
I simply replied back with the sad face emoji, “:(”, just to confirm.
Of course, his tweet got 19 likes by his loyal cult following. But one individual made a snarking remark:
Brennan (“@chordquest1”): What a strange tweet
Pilleater: It’s a beautiful one.
Brennan: I respect the confidence in liking your own tweets
…His bio reads: “He/They i like art and politics. Anarkiddie and Black Mage Peace as a goal not as a tactic to achieving justice.”
And his public profile (for a Physiognomy check) looks like this:
Another passive aggressive white person that needs to emulate a parent. Oh well.
I believe the worse type of people on Twitter are average whites who are so Eurocentric in their malaise identity, they actually pretend they are a “they” or submit to some ideological cause. Of course, this socially-confused, acme teen does not know any better but to project and to be condescending against someone who mentions “Japanese wife “ in a single sentence.
What did I say wrong? When did it become an ethical issue?
I can argue and say this random Brennan, and Scrub Jay, the Eurasian-Futurist boomer, are two of the same person.
We know the AxA movement is right. But sadly, people like this still exist and mislead by social media clout chasing and cocaine-fueled Manhattan nights. That’s why we have paternalism on our side.
Ask, “what’s wrong with white people?”
Here reads the socratic dialogue:
Scrub Jay (“@DystopiaEsq”): Wow. I’m 64. Should I tell them about my 21yo Chinese -American gf? We have a great time. But it’s ok because we are high IQ & she’s Asian and in college at the #1 school for her major. Lol. Don’t some of these critics think a 12 yo should be able to have their genitals cut off?
Pilleater (me): Let's critically examine the Asiansexual desire and the Asian American in this environment.
SJ: I’ll explain it. Han Chinese are the group with the 2nd highest IQ. Second only to Ashkenazi. I’m half Ashkenazi. It’s cultural superiority. Lol.
PE: Right. The women are more likely to understand and get why a sensitive white guy without muscle is just as a good as anyone else, and how "interesting" and artistic he is compared to others. It's the arousal of difference, & dreaming about a man that gives them opportunity.
(And here is where the boomer becomes hostile against the truth):
SJ: What a romantic view untethered to any real world facts. In the real world most people struggle to find meaning, joy, purpose, love, security, food, shelter, money for car insurance, etc. And the ones that can’t throw rocks at the ones who manage to pull it off.
PE: Capitalism is as fake as any other social constructions one may believe in. There is no "real world." As this itself is an ideological statement about the American state. Perhaps you are as well ignoring Girard, Lyotard, Lacan, Laing, and Erickson altogether. WMAF is real threat. Furthermore, your condescending view will not make someone attracted towards Human Bio-diversity, Heidegger, or any form of boomer conservative suburban utopia. WMAF is an objective reality, an art scene, and something ultimately white women cannot compete with. Desire over STEM.
SJ: I was 58 before I realized Chinese women liked and admired me. “You smart good” she said. She was 61. 3 Chinese women later, I realize Asians have a “me” fetish. Lol I can’t help it if they want me!
PE: If you believe in a "fetish," you might as well advocate there is such things as "racists." Liberal society is hostile against desire, the same desire where Badiou talks about a utopian "communist" dream. We pick & discriminate. People are not egalitarian bots with equate desires.
SJ: This is totally a philosophy AI bot. “equate desires”. Lol. “Innate”. I’m glad I’m still smarter than a bot. (In another post he wrote): The point of communism is not to help the downtrodden, it’s to harness the resentment of the downtrodden to gain political power.
PE: Boomers who believe "communism is evil" end up supporting the rainbow capitalist regime, and your Chinese wife & Eurasian children will never advocate the Eurocentric liberal world, as communism is innate within Chinese desires. You are merely a repressed Asiansexual.
SJ: I’m talking about the real world of why people love each other, fuck each other, spend time with each other, meet each other’s psychological needs. You are talking a about some abstract ideological gobbledegook that has nothing to do with day to day real life.
PE: You are a 64 year old man with a young Chinese girl, and you actually still believe in egalitarianism and American exceptionalism? There is a new scene of anime realists & Eurasian futurists who discriminate and go Asian. It's not about some libertarian fantasy you hold on to.
SJ: This is an AI philosophy bot, right? 2 smart only children with rough lives get together and love each other, fuck each other, laugh, go for motorcycle rides and have fun, and you see them though racist social construction lenses. It’s unbelievably stupid. This is two people who have common values and experiences who choose to be with somebody they enjoy being with. Who make each other’s lives better. Or they would leave each other. It’s not hard. The ages and ethnicities are irrelevant except as to things in common. Like IQ.
PE: If you believe in IQ, you must believe race. Murray, Rushton, Jensen, Lynn, ...the data is there. This liberal fantasy you have is not as simple as it's made out to be. I can't simply choose a Japanese wife, can I? Just like how I can't choose a job or place to live. "Rough lives?" What are you saying? Work for 711 and live off a horrible blue collar wage in a post-capitalist society? "Fuck each other." Sexuality is an identity politic, not just an action. Now I'm the "racist?" Boomer confirmed. Jared Taylor is race realist. Lmfao.
SJ: Philosophy bot babble racist Asianamerican communist struggle. Fetish white social lens political.
PE: You only confirmed yourself as another deluded boomer liberal with a repressed Asiansexual desire by saying a string of ideological words like "fetish," "racist," and "communist." I think those three together only confirm some Prager U nature of your reality.
SJ: Fetterman Stroke Biden Dementia Equity Struggle Capitalist Boomer Comrade. Ethnoafrican pornimation Monet Climate Brotherhood Mcleuen.
PE: You are an Asiansexual. All your opponents are somehow "racist," have a "fetish," and likely "communists" because you are a free-choosing liberal that believes humans have egalitarian desires and has nothing to do with race. Asian women pick out weak white guys. White girls fail.
SJ: Satire is lost on you, Comrade:
PE: "Satire" is what liberals advocate when they want to ridicule people they hate or despise. All you have to do is stop being stubborn and agree with me Asian women choose weak white men, and thats good, because it's a normal high IQ thing. Again, if I am so out of touch with reality, why did you rebuttal and claim "well people don't think that hard and treat others like other human beings because I watched several Prager U videos and Aaron Clarey said so." I think you are projecting your own guilt.
SJ: I admire Aaron Clarey. Especially “Asshole Consulting”. “If you want somebody to tell you the truth, hire an Asshole”. I wish I had come up with that. It’s SOOOO true.
PE: Maybe you should watch this video on the Asian question:
SJ: The “Asian question”? No, you are totally not a racist. Lol. My law school got renamed from “Boalt Hall” to “Berkeley Law” b/c some wokester bitched about an article Mr. Boalt wrote 100 years about the “Chinese Question”.
PE: You are a boomer. Talking about race does not make you a racist. Obviously for you I guess you can rebuttal and say "My Asian wife." Your entire generation lives in a liberal, egalitarian fantasy. Communism & fascism are anti-liberal systems, & communism has power in China.
SJ: We are both hotter than those two. We will watch it later for laughs. We both have work to do now.
PE: The White-Male-Asian-Female desire lives beyond puritan capitalism. Eurasian children will submit towards a greater communism whether you like it or not. You are only accelerating that drive. Your white fantasy will be over in 50 years. Issue is, you are good at lying & acting.
End of dialogue.