The DPRK Ricecels Who Theorize Their Hatred For WMAF

The leftovers of r/hapas have become Korean racial nationalists, pretending to be pro-BRICS and Marxists

Rhetoric is as ancient as Aristotle. To even conduct an act of persuasion, the speaker must know the history of Western civilization and its connection with philosophy. However, understanding the English language isn’t enough to guarantee the same logical conclusions.

George Orwell wrote in his 1946 essay, “Politics and the English Language,” that the English language was becoming “a catalog of swindles and perversions.” In that, “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” Under modernity, the average person has access to once academic-level readings of the text, which becomes lowbrow and outsider to a new cultural understanding. The internet and quick “social media” turn the hardest political concepts into a fashion statement for an isolated and confused mass of soul-searching consumers.

Magnus Hirschfeld’s work “Rassismus,” was published in 1938 after his death. It was the first time the concept of “racism” had ever entered the lexicon of the English language. A gay Jewish man with an Asian boyfriend (Li Shiu Tong) was arguing for a future that would become tolerant of interracial pairings and socieites. J. Edgar Bauer wrote that “Hirschfeld was certainly drawing on his personal experience as a Jewish non-Aryan traveling through Asia and confronting the greatest cultural diversity ever brought about by the racial spectrum of humankind.”¹

This is a brave move. Against all odds, an eccentric intellect can survive in a society that hates his existence, and still change the way we see race and relationships. However, even with the rapid celebrations of queer identities, this kind of progressive behavior is still verboten to talk about, even by the white liberals who once crusaded for it. Ironically, those on the left might call Hirschfeld a “fetishist” or “colonizer,” and some right-leaning critics might say he is another “Jewish subversive.”

We still have a “synthetic left” advocated by the American state since the 1960s. Its purpose was to soften and transform American Marxism into a compatible left that would instead argue for liberalism, division, identity politics, and equity income for those who can’t fit in capitalism and believe they are instead fighting for “socialism.” Examples include the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which seems to care only about poor African children and how “racism” is perpetuated by white donors.

Many advocates of “BRICS,” the future economy of Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa, believe they are fighting for a “multipolarity” world that promises “self-determination,” anti-capitalism, and sincere Chinese Marxism. The work of Aleksandr Dugin immediately divides this fanbase, because they can’t determine whether Dugin is a “racist” or not. And accepting Dugin would mean accepting Arktos Media and its anti-liberal (and anti-communist) associates, from Alain de Benoist to Julius Evola. How is having a pro-China stance significant when racial nationalism, i.e. “ethnonationalism,” is hiding under the veneer of pablum rhetoric? Why not be an advocate for white nationalism then?

I believe many confused racial groups in America already have a sense of racial identity before they even get into politics. The issue is that white liberals and their synthetic left operation have created an entirely new language to sedate racial consciousness for white people, all while allowing racial consciousness for non-whites, and then ironically depending upon the wealth and influence of white liberals. The creation of subculture easily divides up the envious and spiteful into their echo chambers that become non-threatening against the liberal establishment. Anything from “My Little Pony white nationalists” to “acid communists,” the point is to create such odd and contradicting subcultures that even the slightest variation is considered heresy. I believe the synthetic left has co-oped those who are against it and has created a virtual reality of the immature high school clique that says they are against liberalism, but rather impose it, like being goth to emo “posers.”

One such is the creation and hatred against anything that the white man acts, thinks, and says in his unapologetic and sincere nature. This is coming from the self-guilt complex of Judeo-Christian religion and the pathological altruism of European paternalism. Other than whites themselves, the real gaslighters tend to be non-whites, who blame whites for everything, including their failure to live in America. Once non-whites speak the language of the liberal white, the liberal thinks of the non-white just like them, and soon the “reparations” and equity come to fix the egalitarian wound that isn’t doing its job for justice.

Such lunacy of anti-white hate dressed as “critical theory” or “anti-capitalism” comes from this outrageous and irrational quote alone,

“Let me restate: It was white male desire for Asian women that started the push towards interracial marriage in America. In addition, America began to actively portray this specific interracial pairing in order to normalize it to the greater American public.”

This is coming from Douglas Kim; an ex-acidhead, an Incubus fan, a forced Christian, a bored poker player, a privileged Duke graduate, a pro-DPRK to Chinese communist escapist, and an all-over-the-place Korean who is trying to read into Lacan, but fails to grasp the ontology of Western civilization, and thinks "the gaze" is all that there is to Marxism. Kim cites a popular 1952 film as the start of the supposed “white male desire for Asian women,” as if the desire for interracialism was socially constructed or invented by nefarious forces. He weasels his way out by highlighting that only the pairing of white men desiring Asian women can only cause harm, and not Asian men desiring white women, or any equation of black men desiring Asian women, etc. The bias is quite clear here.

Japanese War Bride was directed by King Vidor, a successful film director in his own right. For Kim to cite a typical Edward Said-esque point of Orientalism against lowbrow American propaganda, does not debunk the case that the film was intended to advocate multiracial globalism and egalitarianism. No cohesive Japanese-Eurasians are vying for power in America, and there is no mass exodus of white men pursuing “Japanese war brides” years later. The film was made in response to the end of World War II, and the point was to proclaim the once-enemy Japan as a G7 ally, and it had to tell normal white people that these Asians, The Japanese, are “the good guys.” The Christian vision of the director is riddled throughout the film, advocating the narrative of race-blind liberals; antithetical to Kim’s assumption of the antagonizing and white-specific gazing and colonization.

During that time, The Korean War was happening, and Koreans were considered the bad guys against the Japanese. Bruce Cumings in his study, “North Korea: Another Country,” realizes that the American attack on Korea was motivated by a liberal agenda to rid Korean society of its communist influence from Russia. Communism never belonged in Korea, because it was only a temporary means to racially fight the Japanese. America thus defeated Japan, took the interest of the Japanese, and then went to war against neighboring Asian communist countries that opposed Japan. Japanese War Bride was made on the notion that Japan was good, and that the war was over, not on the premise that there is a “specific interracial pairing” of white men pursuing mono “Asian” women. There were more Chinese than there were Japanese and Koreans in America in the 1950s, so if “Asian” means Japanese, the Chinese would not apply. Kim might as well be talking about how The Simpsons is racist because white people exist in it or that Aladdin is racist because it’s a caricature of Orientalism.

Leon Trotsky wrote in “Literature and Revolution” that Marxism can exist in literary criticism. Instead of talking about or persuading the illiterate working class, Trotsky, a Jew, saw these average people as anti-Semitic, and felt there was no obligation for them to learn about Marxism or enrich their lives with literature. The solution was to advocate a “permanent revolution,” where Marxists should focus on persuading first-world intellectuals and elites rather than the third-world or the stupid, and thus Marxists should enter the film industry, and create scholarly art fighting for a “culture war.” Only the self could ever exist. For Douglas Kim, not even the permanent revolution is enough when the products intended for Marxist conversion fail to convey a message. They become “problematic.”

The intellectualizing and theorizing of the mundane is shallow because no matter what is said and explained scientifically, rhetoric hides the obvious thesis before the conversation begins. Pierre-André Taguieff argued that Alain de Benoist’s concept of “ethnopluralism” is “a strategic attempt to disguise racial supremacist ideas behind an anti-totalitarian and egalitarian discourse.”²³ And as for Douglas Kim, his work is a strategic attempt to disguise the hatred for any pairing of white men and Asian women behind a post-colonial and Marxist discourse.

The origins of this irrational hatred of “WMAF” (white-male-Asian-female) came from a Reddit board “r/hapas.” Reddit already has a politically correct culture dedicated to the mainstream and its congregation on Reddit could only lead to the exposure and study of the philistine. R/hapas is made up of Eurasians, Asian-Americans to half-Asians, who cry about their upbringing and existence as Eurasians. Hence the term “hapa” is used to describe their character. The origin of “hapa” is slang, considering it of Hawaiian to Japanese origin and thus all Eurasians get bastardized as a deracinated and ironic identity of being a liberal subculture. Unfortunately, the "hapas” are self-hating, and focus their energy on hating their parents, who are always white men and Asian women.

This hatred for the white man is deep within liberal society. Not only they are focused on hating whites and white men, but r/hapas also assume there is something wrong with Asian women, thus hating them if they ever date outside their race. This contradiction is between liberalism and racial nationalism, where the binary must exist between either being “white” or “Asian,” and no third position being “Eurasian” could ever exist. Douglas Kim’s entire argument can only be a binary vision between evil men oppressing innocent Asians like the bourgeoisie oppressing the proletariat.

R/hapas came before the subculture of being an “incel,” or “involuntary celibate” was ever popular in the late 2010s. When the 2014 Isla Vista killings happened, the perpetrator was Elliot Rodger, a half-Malaysian Chinese and British American Eurasian. Roger’s character is defined as a narcissistic and flamboyant young man looking for a beautiful girlfriend, which became the ethos of the incel subculture that soon followed in 2017. R/hapas was exclusively targeted to Asian American audiences, who felt social awkwardness, marginalization, or had mental illnesses. The users of r/hapas are jokingly now referred to as “ricecels,” or, Asian American incels.

The blame upon liberalism was also apparent in 4chan culture, which led to the rise of the alt-right. The split was between the “Red pill” advocates and the incel pessimists. Red-pilled users argued for “PUA,” or “game,” which meant there was social intelligence or a skill set to seduce a woman, and that having sex is a discipline, monopolized by the PUA gamers who know how to get it. The incels believed the PUA was futile, and that the hatred of women and liberalism was more important than playing with the broken society. For r/hapas, they could learn games, become alt-right, and succeed in society, or they can dwell in their misery and blame everything on the white man, which liberal society already does. Most of r/hapas sadly took the path of the latter.

After the presidency of Donald Trump, many internet users thought they too could use Troskty-esque meme culture, or use anti-liberalism, as a point of persuasion to get their views across. R/hapas tried to blame their problems on an existing “Alt-Right Asian” category made up of mythical WMAF offsprings or apologists. The entire evidence was fabricated, and it made the pro-WMAF opponents look good. The pranking and discussion of Eurasian internet politics was in full swing.

I interviewed Eurasian Tiger in 2017, the creator of the r/hapas board. He is downright biased and spiteful. Meanwhile, a Eurasian duo by the name of “Shane & Nico” started their podcast programs, “Hapa Supremacy,” “The Hapatarian,” and “Whats HAPAning” as a way to combat Eurasian Tiger’s bias against WMAF and Eurasians. An Asian woman by the name of “The Pholosopher” started her channel, arguing the need for “Libertarian Guys with Asian wives,” again, attacking the paranoia and irrationality of r/hapas. I interviewed Shane & Nico and The Pholosopher during this high time of Eurasian activism.

The soft libertarian influences affected Eurasianism as a means just to combat the common irrationality of ricecels. Harder radicals, like “The Forgotten Nationalist,” were nationalist and Eurasian, and defended the right of WMAF. That was the camp I felt comfortable with. Libertarianism made Eurasianism weak because it denied a Eurasian identity to them. Both WMAF and AMWF make Eurasian children, and both dynamics should be studied as a tie for Eurasianism. Eurasian Tiger wanted to eliminate WMAF and allow only AMWF as a means of keeping the good patriarchy of a malaise “Asian” leadership identity. This still, in return, creates Eurasianism and white men pursuing their Eurasian offspring. Both r/hapas and the Eurasian libertarians become blind to this outcome. This is why the Eurasian nationalists were in the right because they defended both white and Asian interests.

Douglas Kim saw this truth as something to exploit, and so the binary assumption of “white means capitalism” and “Asian means communism” became another veneer to hide the same r/hapas discourse. Ironically, his followers call an Asian or Eurasian an “Uncle Tom” if they side with whites, while the Uncle Tom insult is not applied to supporting Xi Jinping’s regime. Kim’s love for the DPRK, although never visiting or living there, is delusional. A binary is thrown on top of another obscure binary to stop critical thinking of the bigger illogical problem we see. His equation that advocating the DPRK or Chinese Communist Party would mean anti-WMAFism, is out of touch with reality.

Kim’s real problem is that he is a racial nationalist who can’t say he is one because his Orwellian language does not allow it. He is a useful idiot for actual white nationalists who don’t want to live with or mix with Asians. American Renaissance, VDare, Occidental Observer, and Counter-Currents would be pleased with Douglas Kim’s hatred for whites! The libertarian assumption returns as “ethnic nationalism equates to property ownership,” thus a fallacy of nationalist thinking. All the white nationalists want is to be left alone, and every race minds their borders. Everyone is divided in their own lookalike safe space “nation,” and everyone relies on reparations and equity against all European people. Another irony, considering communism only came about through Asia because of Europe. Would white nationalists, like the white liberals, pay for such a minority that hates them back, just so they can live in their all-white America without them? Ethnonationalism, with a bias towards whites, is hidden beneath the rhetorical discourse.

White nationalists argue that “black men hate white men.” This reasoning comes from statistics on race, “human biodiversity” studies, “race realism” reports, and the overall evidence of black men killing everyone. However, do white men have violent tendencies specifically against Asians? If the 2020 “Stop Asian Hate” narrative applies, where is this epidemic of all these random white guys killing Asians? This liberal establishment propaganda tries to negate the ongoing violence of poor blacks against whites and assumes all races are equal, but whites.

Another misunderstanding is about female sexuality. Female sexuality isn’t like a man’s, nor should it ever be treated as an individual. A woman desires power, and a man who is assertive and aggressive is often seen as attractive. When this woman is Asian, she assumes the white man must be racist if he throws a temper tantrum or disobeys any law of Confucian or Asian authority morality. It is normal for a man to get angry at his girlfriend or wife, even go into a rage when he is misunderstood or abused. In a WMAF relationship, it's healthy for a white man to assert his free spirit over the nature of the Asian order. The white man is the free artist, and Eurasian implies cooperation between the liberty and intellect of the white and the precision and harmony of the Asian.

Johann Wolfgang Goethe wrote about the suicidal and devotional European condition in his work, The Sorrows of Young Werther. The protagonist, Werther, desires the love of Charlotte, who rejects his pursuit. Werther commits suicide because he can never attain his love for Charlotte. Charlotte realizes the mistake she has made. There is a realization that a man is loyal to his desire, and he will get it at all costs. One of the biggest corporations in Korea, “Lotte”, named itself after Charlotte in the novel. Their products are so desired, that you would die for them.

On top of Lotte Mart Gwangbok in Busan, there is an outdoor park where customers can walk around and relax. Right in the center are two golden statues of Werther and Charlotte, where Werther is proposing to Charlotte. Lotte encourages everyone to send a love letter to their desired muse, just like in The Sorrows of Young Werther. In Busan, the European man is loved for his devotion and is celebrated by the Korean people. In Korea, the artistic free spirit of the white man is celebrated. It refutes any attack that Koreans are better off without white people, because they celebrate in their ethos the suicidal love of Werther, just like what happens in the devotion of a WMAF.

Next to Werther and Charlotte, from Yours Truly.

A white man didn’t pursue an Asian because he is a “loser” to his people, but because he desires beauty, and beauty is aligned with virtue ethics and the manifestation of that artistic will. His Asian partner should respect this racial difference to create Eurasianism. A misunderstanding of female sexuality assumes the woman will naturally go and be with the “sane” or “normal” guy when that is far from reality. An Asian woman doesn’t leave her white boyfriend because he did something mean or “abused” her for a calm Asian man who doesn’t fight. The latter is seen as a nerd, a passive weakling, and unattractive to female sexuality, regardless of race. The Asian woman pursued the white man because of his ingenious and unapologetic attitude against the liberal state and what others think of him. He is powerful, can protect her, and shows her an artistic culture that’s the best of both worlds.

The anti-WMAF is a philistine, an anti-artist conservative who envies the power, beauty, and virtue ethics of European civilization. Eurasianism, however, is the assimilation of European civilization with the Asian, thus compromising to create something new out of whiteness.

It wouldn’t be punk if it never resisted against authority. And that includes resisting the reactionary order of both white and Asian authority! Thus the “Asian feminist” is powerful, because she is a whitesexual in hiding, willing to criticize Asian society to make it more compatible with the Eurasian. The racial nationalist talking point that she is a “self-hating Asian” is exactly like being a “self-hating Jew,” and somehow, it’s okay to be a “self-hating white.” Eurasianism is manifested in punk culture because both racial nationalists and liberal society hate their existence. Feminism becomes attractive to the Asian woman looking for a new identity that has been abused and kicked around by Asians who care less about European art and society. Giant Robot, Juxtapoz, and even Amped Asia magazine all express some level of this punk rock Eurasianism in the making.

A decade ago in 2013, a blogger by the name of “Chin Lu” wrote an article on Medium,⁴ “Why Yellow Fever Is Different Than “Having a Type.” She attacks the idea of WMAF and its desire-machine function. She shows racist cartoons of stereotypical WMAFs and the developing AxA subculture she is against and implies there must be something evil and icky about a normal white man with glasses. Her liberal excuse,

“What it all boils down to is that it’s important to distinguish between treating someone like she’s your dream girl and making her your fantasy. Fantasies by definition are unrealistic, irrational and not meant to be sustained, while dreams are the hopes and high goals we strive for and then keep. We all have the right to be seen as more than one-dimensional characters, and we all deserve to have fulfilling relationships in which we understand our multifaceted partners. Wouldn’t you agree?”

She is lying to herself, as Asians select and choose their partners all the time. Female sexuality is about choosing men out of their unrealistic fantasies. Couldn’t it be a dream to get that white man into video gaming and professional cosplay? Who is “we” in this plural pronoun assumption? Fulfilling relationships and multifaceted partners all come from a foundation of truth, that highly intelligent people discriminate and choose similar people like themselves on top of the cultural Bell Curve. This Christian idealism is rooted in the liberal spirit of individualism, which is nonexistent in Asian countries. In 2013, the AxA subculture was exploding, and Ms. Lu couldn’t stand what was happening in the Bay Area.

Here’s another fallacy of hers,

“Personal preferences in dating or sex are not the same thing as fetishes. We can’t help whom we’re attracted to, and a lot of us “have a type,” but no one should project the kind of personality, behavior and values they like in a romantic partner onto someone else, let alone an entire ethnic group.”

She does not understand the word “fetish.” The word comes from the 17 century, from the French “fétiche,” or from Portuguese “feitiço,” which can translate to “charm,” or “sorcery.” It means an inanimate object worshiped for its supposed magical powers.

By pointing this out, “preference” is “a greater liking,” while “fetish” is giving power to an object. We naturally like the things, or the objects, that make us human. A whole school of thought, “Object-Oriented Ontology,” is about “non-humankind” and how objects have power over anthropocentrism, that humanity is the only material reality. Philosopher Timothy Morton argues for “hyperobjects,” that the objects have power over us, and can transcend time and space, becoming a part of the egalitarian technological singularity, which liberalism is shy about. We give power to objects because it is rational to do so, and the objects give us power back. Whether expressed through subculture, art installations, or technology, what is “Asian” becomes a hyperobject, focused on that greater likeness chosen by society.

“Racism,” just like the word “fetish,” implies we should people as individuals, regardless of their external background. But this misconception means that identity is lost in the process. Chin Lu would never give up being Asian because it gives her power. When men give her power back, she refuses it and calls it a “projection.” We can’t help loving the better society and people that have better hyperobjects (based upon beauty, thus virtue ethics). A future liberal society leans towards an objectified world, as individuals consume and keep objects that give them identity, and the objects are living and breathing because they need our powers. What is a “fetish” then if it’s rational and righteous? Because there is nothing wrong with desire. Desire destroys liberalism because it discriminates and announces sincerity.

An entire ethnic group can be judged by its identity and the objects it gives power back to it. Black people need hip-hop because hip-hop gives them power, like the Akai MPC; the object that creates hip-hop, thus creating black people and culture. Personality, behavior, and values are wanted in culture, and the opposite sex should manifest those traits. If the intellect or artist never gets that in the partner, then what is love?

Chin Lu’s 2013 artifact of a letter should be frowned upon as an example of a decaying society that can no longer hold the urge of Object-Oriented Ontology and it’s an attack on liberal individualism that negates race. Douglas Kim, the new anti-WMAF fearless leader, could only protest and call her a “boba liberal” in 2023. What is important, is that Lu exposed the AxA subculture as a queer power conflict against the Eurasian. We are experiencing much of the same censorship as we did a decade ago.

An anti-WMAF Twitter account run by Douglas Kim, “Douglas Fantastic,” wrote this,⁵

“stages of WMAF mind virus:

stage 0 - normal Asian, fully easternized, usually with little to no contact with the west, mostly PRC/DPRK

stage 1 - mostly pro-Asian, but still has vestiges of western thought and language as the base layer of how they conceive the world.

stage 2 - many recent entrants of this variety, those who claim to be the vanguard of Asians, but still appeal to western authority to attack people with lower levels of WMAF mind virus to score political points, typically from audience members in the west.

stage 3 - most boba liberals are in this stage. they still believe themselves to be superior to non westernized Asians because of their college degrees or other sorts of markers of "authority" in the west, and believe that they are safe from anti-Asian racism in the west.

stage 4 - openly white supremacist Asians, Esther Ku/Tila Tequila types who blatantly call for the death of Asian men to signal to the majority white population that they are on their side most of these people are beyond redemption, as at this stage it's terminal.”

This reads like the “one-drop rule,” where the most evil person is someone who is no longer “Asian,” whatever that means. Again, I find it amazing that the leftovers from r/hapas have tried to theorize their hatred for WMAF by trying to become BRICS "Marxists," when actually, it's exclusively made up of Korean racial nationalists being useful idiots for American Renaissance and Counter-Currents.

More cringe is Kim’s interest in Marvel comic superheroes. I know Incubus is already a bad band, but to top it off with imagery of American comics makes me feel Kim belongs on Reddit, willing to watch Captain Marvel over 100 times while collecting every single Funko Pop figurine.

Another anti-WMAF account, rumored also to be run by Kim, “SKimilsungist,”⁶ portrays itself as a Korean American girl interested in moving to China and celebrating the DPRK. “She” writes,

“Most East asians have white skin. Even if I have fair complexities I will never look European, and I don’t wanna look like ur kind. I wanna look asians.”⁷

Notice how Kim (or his crony) deliberately misspelled the tweet to sound childish and girly. And while trying to sound like a popular American girl, he infuses racial nationalism in the text. “I wanna look Asian.” What is “Asian” then, if that also means being Japanese, a total contradiction against Korean beauty? What is “Asian” also means Eurasian, because an eclectic mix of Asian traits means no loyalty to Chinese, Japanese, and even Korean parties, the one background Kim belongs to. It would make sense if SKimilsungist is also operated by Kim because someone who does acid also experiences paranoid schizophrenia. Kim is creating a fictional army of WMAF haters to fabricate evidence that there is a movement against it.

His “Yellow Knight” podcast reeks of the same National Justice Party level of grifting cringe, run by superstar “white nationalists” Warren Balogh and Emily Youcis. Douglas Kim trying to start a “brocast” around Korean racial nationalism reminds me of the early days of The Right Stuff, where irony and comedy are used to push the agenda of hating Jews and protecting whites. Now make that paradox around hating whites and protecting Koreans, you get The Yellow Stuff!

Well, what about James Joseph Dresnok? Is he the only good white man because he assimilated with the DPRK and he became a celebrity? Or is that not enough? WMAF relationships likely happen in the elite positions of China and North Korea, between other white BRICS countries. What then does Kim make of WMAFs who gladly work with and support everything he wants? Kim shouldn’t be hating WAMFs if they have power over him.

I think a lot about this r/hapas irrational hatred. I think about the accusation and gaslighting that white men who pursue Asians are supposedly murderers, sadists, or perverts. I think about that insult and think about how that could be used against people like Kim, that what he wants to believe is the truth is not.

Black Americans are often stereotyped for their thuggish behavior for all the right reasons, and yet the intelligent ones fight against this narrative and show they too can be white, act white, or act as a smart individual under liberalism. Is it wrong for black men to want to be normal and to have decent virtue ethics? Perhaps many blacks are upset about the fact that they get judged for being violent criminals, the same way whites feel about racist Asians, like Kim, who gaslights and attacks whites as criminals. It would only make sense to lash out and pretend to be the role model that Kim despises, because that way, you ridicule the concept and prank the ricecels.

The existence of “WMAF porn” on Twitter is a new level of sadist revolution and resistance against the ricecels. Instead of being insulted for being WMAF, why not make porn of it and brag about how cool it is? Let them believe that “white sperm comes in, hapa babies come out,” because it liberates the AxA subculture and allows the censored desire to destroy liberalism. White men who have desired are supposedly evil, so let WMAF or “raceplay” porn happen because you can express and rebuttal against the ricecels that work with the system against queerness. WMAF porn like this takes a cue from the work of Dennis Cooper or Peter Sotos, where explicit sexual desires are free because sadism is about revolution, and to show the desire in full imagery is to show the possible future one can have.

Thomas Ligotti believes that there is “The Conspiracy Against the Human Race,” negating life as bad. “No human should belong in this world” is the same philosophy that Douglas Kim has. No WMAF or Eurasian children can exist because they are evil, according to Kim. Are we supposed to socially control the population with the degrowth of Malthusianism?

If all white men should be race-blind and yet still leave “Asians” alone, wouldn’t they assimilate into the Asian culture that is run by an AMWF elite? Wouldn’t that create more WMAFs? There is no respect for the WMAF or Eurasian, and thus a byproduct of the “suicidal,” “Asian,” and “promiscuous,” become our cultural values and secret muse.

The real endgame is like Octavia Butler’s Lilith’s Brood, where alien rape and force synthesis is an accelerating drive of destiny, and Kim wants to resist that alien invasion. Would we have peaceful egalitarianism? Or would we have “African” values of dysgenic and vandal destruction? And yes, wouldn’t that be racist to call that out? Butler was writing a progressive story!

And I wonder what Kim thinks of John Cena who fluently speaks Chinese?

None of this matters to him. A party that hates WMAFs wouldn’t win votes, just like the National Justice Party that expects to be voted in by a Jewish elite they hate. Even more strange is that Caleb Maupin, ideological leader of the Center for Political Innovation, unfortunately, follows Douglas Kim and his Twitter accounts. Are Kim and the ricecels eager to take over American communist parties and persuade them of their anti-WMAF agenda?

What we do know is that as much as they try, I don’t think Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un would ever accept Black Lives Matter, homosexuals, lesbians, trans people, Anarchists, or any English speaker in the “Democratic People’s Republic” of Korea. The very thing that ricecels desire, a real racial identity, will always be out of reach to them, so as long as they keep intellectualizing by using a language that guilt trips by design. Liberalism will kill them with multiculturalism.

Odd enough, no one talks about the forbidden homosexual love between a white man and an Asian man, or “WMAM.” They are full-on Eurasians, even without producing children. They both love and desire one another. Likely Kim will get offended if the white man is at the top and the Asian guy is at the bottom. What country are they supposed to go to then if homosexuality is banned in China and Korea?

They never will realize that Eurasianism is a good thing, and it’s inevitable. They can’t resist WMAF because the truth is it’s in front of us. Kim talks about the “WMAF mind virus,” when really, he’s talking about its intellectual and ideological leader, pilleater. Sowing division is what the liberal state does because WMAF and AMWF produce the same thing; Eurasians. Eurasians don’t hate each other, and white men love Asian men, and vice versa.

I’m Kim’s worst nightmare. That’s why normal white guys love talking about Japanese culture and society because if all Koreans were like Kim, no white guy would ever be interested in the philistine nature of Korea. South Korea at least produces the art that the Western world finds attractive. Without it, no one wants to march with the DPRK because they don’t make good electronic music. That simple.

A silly 1950s movie can’t be responsible for all Asiansexual desires, as future Disney films like Big Hero 6 and Turning Red embrace Eurasian Futurism to an extreme outside the outdated narrative that a Japanese woman is somehow a Christian. I can point out the Asiansexuality found in the 1821 work “Confessions of an English Opium-Eater” and many other important works, but Kim doesn’t know what he’s talking about in critical theory because his taste in art is extremely bland and mediocre. WMAFism is based upon good art, and Kim can’t respect that.

I’ve seen the same anti-WMAF hatred for almost a decade now, and it’s all the same. Just like how Magnus Hirschfeld invented the word “racism,” the word “hapa” was recently invented to hate white people. In a reverse scenario, WMAF is under threat by a liberal elite who invents a political language to stop anti-liberal Eurasianism. It was never about poor “Asian men” in America who can’t get women and the conspiracy to go against them. The system is anti-white, and it loves Malthusian division. It’s the WMAFs and the entire Eurasian people that are oppressed.

Make way! The AxA Movement is unstoppable.

-pe

12-23-2023

1. Bauer, J. Edgar (2006–11). "Magnus Hirschfeld: Panhumanism and the Sexual Cultures of Asia"; Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context, No. 14 (http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue14/bauer.html)

2. Taguieff, Pierre-André (2001). The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles. University of Minnesota Press. pg. 109.

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnopluralism (Accessed 12-23-2023)

4. https://thebolditalic.com/why-yellow-fever-is-different-than-having-a-type-the-bold-italic-san-francisco-36ed29359dfb

5. https://x.com/dougfantastic/status/1625214712789999625?s=20

6. https://twitter.com/SKimilsungist

7. https://x.com/SKimilsungist/status/1738388984555082136?s=20